diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/test/cuckoocache_tests.cpp | 25 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp | 45 |
2 files changed, 29 insertions, 41 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/cuckoocache_tests.cpp b/src/test/cuckoocache_tests.cpp index ccd715562..8cae4e66e 100644 --- a/src/test/cuckoocache_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/cuckoocache_tests.cpp @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ // file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php. #include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp> #include "cuckoocache.h" +#include "script/sigcache.h" #include "test/test_bitcoin.h" #include "random.h" #include <thread> @@ -36,20 +37,6 @@ void insecure_GetRandHash(uint256& t) *(ptr++) = insecure_rand.rand32(); } -/** Definition copied from /src/script/sigcache.cpp - */ -class uint256Hasher -{ -public: - template <uint8_t hash_select> - uint32_t operator()(const uint256& key) const - { - static_assert(hash_select <8, "SignatureCacheHasher only has 8 hashes available."); - uint32_t u; - std::memcpy(&u, key.begin() + 4 * hash_select, 4); - return u; - } -}; /* Test that no values not inserted into the cache are read out of it. @@ -59,7 +46,7 @@ public: BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(test_cuckoocache_no_fakes) { insecure_rand = FastRandomContext(true); - CuckooCache::cache<uint256, uint256Hasher> cc{}; + CuckooCache::cache<uint256, SignatureCacheHasher> cc{}; size_t megabytes = 4; cc.setup_bytes(megabytes << 20); uint256 v; @@ -138,7 +125,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(cuckoocache_hit_rate_ok) double HitRateThresh = 0.98; size_t megabytes = 4; for (double load = 0.1; load < 2; load *= 2) { - double hits = test_cache<CuckooCache::cache<uint256, uint256Hasher>>(megabytes, load); + double hits = test_cache<CuckooCache::cache<uint256, SignatureCacheHasher>>(megabytes, load); BOOST_CHECK(normalize_hit_rate(hits, load) > HitRateThresh); } } @@ -206,7 +193,7 @@ void test_cache_erase(size_t megabytes) BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(cuckoocache_erase_ok) { size_t megabytes = 4; - test_cache_erase<CuckooCache::cache<uint256, uint256Hasher>>(megabytes); + test_cache_erase<CuckooCache::cache<uint256, SignatureCacheHasher>>(megabytes); } template <typename Cache> @@ -293,7 +280,7 @@ void test_cache_erase_parallel(size_t megabytes) BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(cuckoocache_erase_parallel_ok) { size_t megabytes = 4; - test_cache_erase_parallel<CuckooCache::cache<uint256, uint256Hasher>>(megabytes); + test_cache_erase_parallel<CuckooCache::cache<uint256, SignatureCacheHasher>>(megabytes); } @@ -389,7 +376,7 @@ void test_cache_generations() } BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(cuckoocache_generations) { - test_cache_generations<CuckooCache::cache<uint256, uint256Hasher>>(); + test_cache_generations<CuckooCache::cache<uint256, SignatureCacheHasher>>(); } BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END(); diff --git a/src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp b/src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp index bc2f49ef3..ed6782ea3 100644 --- a/src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp @@ -16,7 +16,8 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(policyestimator_tests, BasicTestingSetup) BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates) { - CTxMemPool mpool; + CBlockPolicyEstimator feeEst; + CTxMemPool mpool(&feeEst); TestMemPoolEntryHelper entry; CAmount basefee(2000); CAmount deltaFee(100); @@ -78,16 +79,16 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates) // At this point we should need to combine 5 buckets to get enough data points // So estimateFee(1,2,3) should fail and estimateFee(4) should return somewhere around // 8*baserate. estimateFee(4) %'s are 100,100,100,100,90 = average 98% - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(1) == CFeeRate(0)); - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(2) == CFeeRate(0)); - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(3) == CFeeRate(0)); - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(4).GetFeePerK() < 8*baseRate.GetFeePerK() + deltaFee); - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(4).GetFeePerK() > 8*baseRate.GetFeePerK() - deltaFee); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(1) == CFeeRate(0)); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(2) == CFeeRate(0)); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(3) == CFeeRate(0)); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(4).GetFeePerK() < 8*baseRate.GetFeePerK() + deltaFee); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(4).GetFeePerK() > 8*baseRate.GetFeePerK() - deltaFee); int answerFound; - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartFee(1, &answerFound) == mpool.estimateFee(4) && answerFound == 4); - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartFee(3, &answerFound) == mpool.estimateFee(4) && answerFound == 4); - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartFee(4, &answerFound) == mpool.estimateFee(4) && answerFound == 4); - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartFee(8, &answerFound) == mpool.estimateFee(8) && answerFound == 8); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateSmartFee(1, &answerFound, mpool) == feeEst.estimateFee(4) && answerFound == 4); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateSmartFee(3, &answerFound, mpool) == feeEst.estimateFee(4) && answerFound == 4); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateSmartFee(4, &answerFound, mpool) == feeEst.estimateFee(4) && answerFound == 4); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateSmartFee(8, &answerFound, mpool) == feeEst.estimateFee(8) && answerFound == 8); } } @@ -99,7 +100,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates) // Second highest feerate has 100% chance of being included by 2 blocks, // so estimateFee(2) should return 9*baseRate etc... for (int i = 1; i < 10;i++) { - origFeeEst.push_back(mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK()); + origFeeEst.push_back(feeEst.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK()); if (i > 2) { // Fee estimates should be monotonically decreasing BOOST_CHECK(origFeeEst[i-1] <= origFeeEst[i-2]); } @@ -118,10 +119,10 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates) while (blocknum < 250) mpool.removeForBlock(block, ++blocknum); - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(1) == CFeeRate(0)); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(1) == CFeeRate(0)); for (int i = 2; i < 10;i++) { - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() < origFeeEst[i-1] + deltaFee); - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() < origFeeEst[i-1] + deltaFee); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee); } @@ -141,8 +142,8 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates) int answerFound; for (int i = 1; i < 10;i++) { - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(i) == CFeeRate(0) || mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee); - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartFee(i, &answerFound).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[answerFound-1] - deltaFee); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(i) == CFeeRate(0) || feeEst.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateSmartFee(i, &answerFound, mpool).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[answerFound-1] - deltaFee); } // Mine all those transactions @@ -157,9 +158,9 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates) } mpool.removeForBlock(block, 265); block.clear(); - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(1) == CFeeRate(0)); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(1) == CFeeRate(0)); for (int i = 2; i < 10;i++) { - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee); } // Mine 200 more blocks where everything is mined every block @@ -179,9 +180,9 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates) mpool.removeForBlock(block, ++blocknum); block.clear(); } - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(1) == CFeeRate(0)); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(1) == CFeeRate(0)); for (int i = 2; i < 10; i++) { - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() < origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() < origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee); } // Test that if the mempool is limited, estimateSmartFee won't return a value below the mempool min fee @@ -190,8 +191,8 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates) mpool.TrimToSize(1); BOOST_CHECK(mpool.GetMinFee(1).GetFeePerK() > feeV[5]); for (int i = 1; i < 10; i++) { - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartFee(i).GetFeePerK() >= mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK()); - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartFee(i).GetFeePerK() >= mpool.GetMinFee(1).GetFeePerK()); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateSmartFee(i, NULL, mpool).GetFeePerK() >= feeEst.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK()); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateSmartFee(i, NULL, mpool).GetFeePerK() >= mpool.GetMinFee(1).GetFeePerK()); } } |