aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/test
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test')
-rw-r--r--src/test/cuckoocache_tests.cpp25
-rw-r--r--src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp45
2 files changed, 29 insertions, 41 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/cuckoocache_tests.cpp b/src/test/cuckoocache_tests.cpp
index ccd715562..8cae4e66e 100644
--- a/src/test/cuckoocache_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/cuckoocache_tests.cpp
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
// file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
#include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp>
#include "cuckoocache.h"
+#include "script/sigcache.h"
#include "test/test_bitcoin.h"
#include "random.h"
#include <thread>
@@ -36,20 +37,6 @@ void insecure_GetRandHash(uint256& t)
*(ptr++) = insecure_rand.rand32();
}
-/** Definition copied from /src/script/sigcache.cpp
- */
-class uint256Hasher
-{
-public:
- template <uint8_t hash_select>
- uint32_t operator()(const uint256& key) const
- {
- static_assert(hash_select <8, "SignatureCacheHasher only has 8 hashes available.");
- uint32_t u;
- std::memcpy(&u, key.begin() + 4 * hash_select, 4);
- return u;
- }
-};
/* Test that no values not inserted into the cache are read out of it.
@@ -59,7 +46,7 @@ public:
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(test_cuckoocache_no_fakes)
{
insecure_rand = FastRandomContext(true);
- CuckooCache::cache<uint256, uint256Hasher> cc{};
+ CuckooCache::cache<uint256, SignatureCacheHasher> cc{};
size_t megabytes = 4;
cc.setup_bytes(megabytes << 20);
uint256 v;
@@ -138,7 +125,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(cuckoocache_hit_rate_ok)
double HitRateThresh = 0.98;
size_t megabytes = 4;
for (double load = 0.1; load < 2; load *= 2) {
- double hits = test_cache<CuckooCache::cache<uint256, uint256Hasher>>(megabytes, load);
+ double hits = test_cache<CuckooCache::cache<uint256, SignatureCacheHasher>>(megabytes, load);
BOOST_CHECK(normalize_hit_rate(hits, load) > HitRateThresh);
}
}
@@ -206,7 +193,7 @@ void test_cache_erase(size_t megabytes)
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(cuckoocache_erase_ok)
{
size_t megabytes = 4;
- test_cache_erase<CuckooCache::cache<uint256, uint256Hasher>>(megabytes);
+ test_cache_erase<CuckooCache::cache<uint256, SignatureCacheHasher>>(megabytes);
}
template <typename Cache>
@@ -293,7 +280,7 @@ void test_cache_erase_parallel(size_t megabytes)
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(cuckoocache_erase_parallel_ok)
{
size_t megabytes = 4;
- test_cache_erase_parallel<CuckooCache::cache<uint256, uint256Hasher>>(megabytes);
+ test_cache_erase_parallel<CuckooCache::cache<uint256, SignatureCacheHasher>>(megabytes);
}
@@ -389,7 +376,7 @@ void test_cache_generations()
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(cuckoocache_generations)
{
- test_cache_generations<CuckooCache::cache<uint256, uint256Hasher>>();
+ test_cache_generations<CuckooCache::cache<uint256, SignatureCacheHasher>>();
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END();
diff --git a/src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp b/src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp
index bc2f49ef3..ed6782ea3 100644
--- a/src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp
@@ -16,7 +16,8 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(policyestimator_tests, BasicTestingSetup)
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates)
{
- CTxMemPool mpool;
+ CBlockPolicyEstimator feeEst;
+ CTxMemPool mpool(&feeEst);
TestMemPoolEntryHelper entry;
CAmount basefee(2000);
CAmount deltaFee(100);
@@ -78,16 +79,16 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates)
// At this point we should need to combine 5 buckets to get enough data points
// So estimateFee(1,2,3) should fail and estimateFee(4) should return somewhere around
// 8*baserate. estimateFee(4) %'s are 100,100,100,100,90 = average 98%
- BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(1) == CFeeRate(0));
- BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(2) == CFeeRate(0));
- BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(3) == CFeeRate(0));
- BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(4).GetFeePerK() < 8*baseRate.GetFeePerK() + deltaFee);
- BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(4).GetFeePerK() > 8*baseRate.GetFeePerK() - deltaFee);
+ BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(1) == CFeeRate(0));
+ BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(2) == CFeeRate(0));
+ BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(3) == CFeeRate(0));
+ BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(4).GetFeePerK() < 8*baseRate.GetFeePerK() + deltaFee);
+ BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(4).GetFeePerK() > 8*baseRate.GetFeePerK() - deltaFee);
int answerFound;
- BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartFee(1, &answerFound) == mpool.estimateFee(4) && answerFound == 4);
- BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartFee(3, &answerFound) == mpool.estimateFee(4) && answerFound == 4);
- BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartFee(4, &answerFound) == mpool.estimateFee(4) && answerFound == 4);
- BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartFee(8, &answerFound) == mpool.estimateFee(8) && answerFound == 8);
+ BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateSmartFee(1, &answerFound, mpool) == feeEst.estimateFee(4) && answerFound == 4);
+ BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateSmartFee(3, &answerFound, mpool) == feeEst.estimateFee(4) && answerFound == 4);
+ BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateSmartFee(4, &answerFound, mpool) == feeEst.estimateFee(4) && answerFound == 4);
+ BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateSmartFee(8, &answerFound, mpool) == feeEst.estimateFee(8) && answerFound == 8);
}
}
@@ -99,7 +100,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates)
// Second highest feerate has 100% chance of being included by 2 blocks,
// so estimateFee(2) should return 9*baseRate etc...
for (int i = 1; i < 10;i++) {
- origFeeEst.push_back(mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK());
+ origFeeEst.push_back(feeEst.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK());
if (i > 2) { // Fee estimates should be monotonically decreasing
BOOST_CHECK(origFeeEst[i-1] <= origFeeEst[i-2]);
}
@@ -118,10 +119,10 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates)
while (blocknum < 250)
mpool.removeForBlock(block, ++blocknum);
- BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(1) == CFeeRate(0));
+ BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(1) == CFeeRate(0));
for (int i = 2; i < 10;i++) {
- BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() < origFeeEst[i-1] + deltaFee);
- BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee);
+ BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() < origFeeEst[i-1] + deltaFee);
+ BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee);
}
@@ -141,8 +142,8 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates)
int answerFound;
for (int i = 1; i < 10;i++) {
- BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(i) == CFeeRate(0) || mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee);
- BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartFee(i, &answerFound).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[answerFound-1] - deltaFee);
+ BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(i) == CFeeRate(0) || feeEst.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee);
+ BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateSmartFee(i, &answerFound, mpool).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[answerFound-1] - deltaFee);
}
// Mine all those transactions
@@ -157,9 +158,9 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates)
}
mpool.removeForBlock(block, 265);
block.clear();
- BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(1) == CFeeRate(0));
+ BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(1) == CFeeRate(0));
for (int i = 2; i < 10;i++) {
- BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee);
+ BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee);
}
// Mine 200 more blocks where everything is mined every block
@@ -179,9 +180,9 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates)
mpool.removeForBlock(block, ++blocknum);
block.clear();
}
- BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(1) == CFeeRate(0));
+ BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(1) == CFeeRate(0));
for (int i = 2; i < 10; i++) {
- BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() < origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee);
+ BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() < origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee);
}
// Test that if the mempool is limited, estimateSmartFee won't return a value below the mempool min fee
@@ -190,8 +191,8 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates)
mpool.TrimToSize(1);
BOOST_CHECK(mpool.GetMinFee(1).GetFeePerK() > feeV[5]);
for (int i = 1; i < 10; i++) {
- BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartFee(i).GetFeePerK() >= mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK());
- BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartFee(i).GetFeePerK() >= mpool.GetMinFee(1).GetFeePerK());
+ BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateSmartFee(i, NULL, mpool).GetFeePerK() >= feeEst.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK());
+ BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateSmartFee(i, NULL, mpool).GetFeePerK() >= mpool.GetMinFee(1).GetFeePerK());
}
}