aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/net_processing.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/net_processing.cpp')
-rw-r--r--src/net_processing.cpp179
1 files changed, 95 insertions, 84 deletions
diff --git a/src/net_processing.cpp b/src/net_processing.cpp
index 5f1e7318f..ca701a7e5 100644
--- a/src/net_processing.cpp
+++ b/src/net_processing.cpp
@@ -157,9 +157,6 @@ std::map<uint256, std::map<uint256, COrphanTx>::iterator> g_orphans_by_wtxid GUA
void EraseOrphansFor(NodeId peer);
-/** Increase a node's misbehavior score. */
-void Misbehaving(NodeId nodeid, int howmuch, const std::string& message="") EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main);
-
// Internal stuff
namespace {
/** Number of nodes with fSyncStarted. */
@@ -1062,23 +1059,22 @@ unsigned int LimitOrphanTxSize(unsigned int nMaxOrphans)
* Increment peer's misbehavior score. If the new value >= DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD, mark the node
* to be discouraged, meaning the peer might be disconnected and added to the discouragement filter.
*/
-void Misbehaving(NodeId pnode, int howmuch, const std::string& message) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main)
+void Misbehaving(const NodeId pnode, const int howmuch, const std::string& message) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main)
{
- if (howmuch == 0)
- return;
+ assert(howmuch > 0);
- CNodeState *state = State(pnode);
- if (state == nullptr)
- return;
+ CNodeState* const state = State(pnode);
+ if (state == nullptr) return;
state->nMisbehavior += howmuch;
- std::string message_prefixed = message.empty() ? "" : (": " + message);
+ const std::string message_prefixed = message.empty() ? "" : (": " + message);
if (state->nMisbehavior >= DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD && state->nMisbehavior - howmuch < DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD)
{
- LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "%s: %s peer=%d (%d -> %d) DISCOURAGE THRESHOLD EXCEEDED%s\n", __func__, state->name, pnode, state->nMisbehavior-howmuch, state->nMisbehavior, message_prefixed);
+ LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Misbehaving: peer=%d (%d -> %d) DISCOURAGE THRESHOLD EXCEEDED%s\n", pnode, state->nMisbehavior - howmuch, state->nMisbehavior, message_prefixed);
state->m_should_discourage = true;
- } else
- LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "%s: %s peer=%d (%d -> %d)%s\n", __func__, state->name, pnode, state->nMisbehavior-howmuch, state->nMisbehavior, message_prefixed);
+ } else {
+ LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Misbehaving: peer=%d (%d -> %d)%s\n", pnode, state->nMisbehavior - howmuch, state->nMisbehavior, message_prefixed);
+ }
}
/**
@@ -1799,7 +1795,7 @@ inline void static SendBlockTransactions(const CBlock& block, const BlockTransac
for (size_t i = 0; i < req.indexes.size(); i++) {
if (req.indexes[i] >= block.vtx.size()) {
LOCK(cs_main);
- Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, strprintf("Peer %d sent us a getblocktxn with out-of-bounds tx indices", pfrom.GetId()));
+ Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, "getblocktxn with out-of-bounds tx indices");
return;
}
resp.txn[i] = block.vtx[req.indexes[i]];
@@ -1848,7 +1844,7 @@ static void ProcessHeadersMessage(CNode& pfrom, CConnman& connman, ChainstateMan
UpdateBlockAvailability(pfrom.GetId(), headers.back().GetHash());
if (nodestate->nUnconnectingHeaders % MAX_UNCONNECTING_HEADERS == 0) {
- Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 20);
+ Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 20, strprintf("%d non-connecting headers", nodestate->nUnconnectingHeaders));
}
return;
}
@@ -2307,7 +2303,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
if (pfrom.nVersion != 0)
{
LOCK(cs_main);
- Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 1);
+ Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 1, "redundant version message");
return;
}
@@ -2468,7 +2464,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
if (pfrom.nVersion == 0) {
// Must have a version message before anything else
LOCK(cs_main);
- Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 1);
+ Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 1, "non-version message before version handshake");
return;
}
@@ -2535,7 +2531,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
if (!pfrom.fSuccessfullyConnected) {
// Must have a verack message before anything else
LOCK(cs_main);
- Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 1);
+ Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 1, "non-verack message before version handshake");
return;
}
@@ -3203,7 +3199,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
ReadStatus status = partialBlock.InitData(cmpctblock, vExtraTxnForCompact);
if (status == READ_STATUS_INVALID) {
MarkBlockAsReceived(pindex->GetBlockHash()); // Reset in-flight state in case Misbehaving does not result in a disconnect
- Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, strprintf("Peer %d sent us invalid compact block\n", pfrom.GetId()));
+ Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, "invalid compact block");
return;
} else if (status == READ_STATUS_FAILED) {
// Duplicate txindexes, the block is now in-flight, so just request it
@@ -3336,7 +3332,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
ReadStatus status = partialBlock.FillBlock(*pblock, resp.txn);
if (status == READ_STATUS_INVALID) {
MarkBlockAsReceived(resp.blockhash); // Reset in-flight state in case Misbehaving does not result in a disconnect
- Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, strprintf("Peer %d sent us invalid compact block/non-matching block transactions\n", pfrom.GetId()));
+ Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, "invalid compact block/non-matching block transactions");
return;
} else if (status == READ_STATUS_FAILED) {
// Might have collided, fall back to getdata now :(
@@ -3605,7 +3601,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
{
// There is no excuse for sending a too-large filter
LOCK(cs_main);
- Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100);
+ Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, "too-large bloom filter");
}
else if (pfrom.m_tx_relay != nullptr)
{
@@ -3639,7 +3635,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
}
if (bad) {
LOCK(cs_main);
- Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100);
+ Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, "bad filteradd message");
}
return;
}
@@ -3716,32 +3712,49 @@ void ProcessMessage(
return;
}
+/** Maybe disconnect a peer and discourage future connections from its address.
+ *
+ * @param[in] pnode The node to check.
+ * @return True if the peer was marked for disconnection in this function
+ */
bool PeerLogicValidation::MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect(CNode& pnode)
{
- AssertLockHeld(cs_main);
- CNodeState &state = *State(pnode.GetId());
+ const NodeId peer_id{pnode.GetId()};
+ {
+ LOCK(cs_main);
+ CNodeState& state = *State(peer_id);
+
+ // There's nothing to do if the m_should_discourage flag isn't set
+ if (!state.m_should_discourage) return false;
- if (state.m_should_discourage) {
state.m_should_discourage = false;
- if (pnode.HasPermission(PF_NOBAN)) {
- LogPrintf("Warning: not punishing whitelisted peer %s!\n", pnode.addr.ToString());
- } else if (pnode.m_manual_connection) {
- LogPrintf("Warning: not punishing manually-connected peer %s!\n", pnode.addr.ToString());
- } else if (pnode.addr.IsLocal()) {
- // Disconnect but don't discourage this local node
- LogPrintf("Warning: disconnecting but not discouraging local peer %s!\n", pnode.addr.ToString());
- pnode.fDisconnect = true;
- } else {
- // Disconnect and discourage all nodes sharing the address
- LogPrintf("Disconnecting and discouraging peer %s!\n", pnode.addr.ToString());
- if (m_banman) {
- m_banman->Discourage(pnode.addr);
- }
- connman->DisconnectNode(pnode.addr);
- }
+ } // cs_main
+
+ if (pnode.HasPermission(PF_NOBAN)) {
+ // We never disconnect or discourage peers for bad behavior if they have the NOBAN permission flag
+ LogPrintf("Warning: not punishing noban peer %d!\n", peer_id);
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ if (pnode.m_manual_connection) {
+ // We never disconnect or discourage manual peers for bad behavior
+ LogPrintf("Warning: not punishing manually connected peer %d!\n", peer_id);
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ if (pnode.addr.IsLocal()) {
+ // We disconnect local peers for bad behavior but don't discourage (since that would discourage
+ // all peers on the same local address)
+ LogPrintf("Warning: disconnecting but not discouraging local peer %d!\n", peer_id);
+ pnode.fDisconnect = true;
return true;
}
- return false;
+
+ // Normal case: Disconnect the peer and discourage all nodes sharing the address
+ LogPrintf("Disconnecting and discouraging peer %d!\n", peer_id);
+ if (m_banman) m_banman->Discourage(pnode.addr);
+ connman->DisconnectNode(pnode.addr);
+ return true;
}
bool PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessages(CNode* pfrom, std::atomic<bool>& interruptMsgProc)
@@ -3834,9 +3847,6 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::ProcessMessages(CNode* pfrom, std::atomic<bool>& inter
LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "%s(%s, %u bytes): Unknown exception caught\n", __func__, SanitizeString(msg_type), nMessageSize);
}
- LOCK(cs_main);
- MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect(*pfrom);
-
return fMoreWork;
}
@@ -3999,48 +4009,49 @@ public:
bool PeerLogicValidation::SendMessages(CNode* pto)
{
const Consensus::Params& consensusParams = Params().GetConsensus();
- {
- // Don't send anything until the version handshake is complete
- if (!pto->fSuccessfullyConnected || pto->fDisconnect)
- return true;
- // If we get here, the outgoing message serialization version is set and can't change.
- const CNetMsgMaker msgMaker(pto->GetSendVersion());
+ // We must call MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect first, to ensure that we'll
+ // disconnect misbehaving peers even before the version handshake is complete.
+ if (MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect(*pto)) return true;
- //
- // Message: ping
- //
- bool pingSend = false;
- if (pto->fPingQueued) {
- // RPC ping request by user
- pingSend = true;
- }
- if (pto->nPingNonceSent == 0 && pto->m_ping_start.load() + PING_INTERVAL < GetTime<std::chrono::microseconds>()) {
- // Ping automatically sent as a latency probe & keepalive.
- pingSend = true;
- }
- if (pingSend) {
- uint64_t nonce = 0;
- while (nonce == 0) {
- GetRandBytes((unsigned char*)&nonce, sizeof(nonce));
- }
- pto->fPingQueued = false;
- pto->m_ping_start = GetTime<std::chrono::microseconds>();
- if (pto->nVersion > BIP0031_VERSION) {
- pto->nPingNonceSent = nonce;
- connman->PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::PING, nonce));
- } else {
- // Peer is too old to support ping command with nonce, pong will never arrive.
- pto->nPingNonceSent = 0;
- connman->PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::PING));
- }
- }
+ // Don't send anything until the version handshake is complete
+ if (!pto->fSuccessfullyConnected || pto->fDisconnect)
+ return true;
- TRY_LOCK(cs_main, lockMain);
- if (!lockMain)
- return true;
+ // If we get here, the outgoing message serialization version is set and can't change.
+ const CNetMsgMaker msgMaker(pto->GetSendVersion());
- if (MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect(*pto)) return true;
+ //
+ // Message: ping
+ //
+ bool pingSend = false;
+ if (pto->fPingQueued) {
+ // RPC ping request by user
+ pingSend = true;
+ }
+ if (pto->nPingNonceSent == 0 && pto->m_ping_start.load() + PING_INTERVAL < GetTime<std::chrono::microseconds>()) {
+ // Ping automatically sent as a latency probe & keepalive.
+ pingSend = true;
+ }
+ if (pingSend) {
+ uint64_t nonce = 0;
+ while (nonce == 0) {
+ GetRandBytes((unsigned char*)&nonce, sizeof(nonce));
+ }
+ pto->fPingQueued = false;
+ pto->m_ping_start = GetTime<std::chrono::microseconds>();
+ if (pto->nVersion > BIP0031_VERSION) {
+ pto->nPingNonceSent = nonce;
+ connman->PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::PING, nonce));
+ } else {
+ // Peer is too old to support ping command with nonce, pong will never arrive.
+ pto->nPingNonceSent = 0;
+ connman->PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::PING));
+ }
+ }
+
+ {
+ LOCK(cs_main);
CNodeState &state = *State(pto->GetId());
@@ -4602,7 +4613,7 @@ bool PeerLogicValidation::SendMessages(CNode* pto)
pto->m_tx_relay->nextSendTimeFeeFilter = timeNow + GetRandInt(MAX_FEEFILTER_CHANGE_DELAY) * 1000000;
}
}
- }
+ } // release cs_main
return true;
}