diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'src/main.cpp')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/main.cpp | 275 |
1 files changed, 232 insertions, 43 deletions
diff --git a/src/main.cpp b/src/main.cpp index 6cb9f43c0..94fcd6223 100644 --- a/src/main.cpp +++ b/src/main.cpp @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ #include "checkpoints.h" #include "checkqueue.h" #include "consensus/consensus.h" +#include "consensus/merkle.h" #include "consensus/validation.h" #include "hash.h" #include "init.h" @@ -66,10 +67,10 @@ bool fReindex = false; bool fTxIndex = false; bool fHavePruned = false; bool fPruneMode = false; -bool fIsBareMultisigStd = true; +bool fIsBareMultisigStd = DEFAULT_PERMIT_BAREMULTISIG; bool fRequireStandard = true; bool fCheckBlockIndex = false; -bool fCheckpointsEnabled = true; +bool fCheckpointsEnabled = DEFAULT_CHECKPOINTS_ENABLED; size_t nCoinCacheUsage = 5000 * 300; uint64_t nPruneTarget = 0; bool fAlerts = DEFAULT_ALERTS; @@ -832,15 +833,42 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPool(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState &state, const CTransa return state.Invalid(false, REJECT_ALREADY_KNOWN, "txn-already-in-mempool"); // Check for conflicts with in-memory transactions + set<uint256> setConflicts; { LOCK(pool.cs); // protect pool.mapNextTx - for (unsigned int i = 0; i < tx.vin.size(); i++) + BOOST_FOREACH(const CTxIn &txin, tx.vin) { - COutPoint outpoint = tx.vin[i].prevout; - if (pool.mapNextTx.count(outpoint)) + if (pool.mapNextTx.count(txin.prevout)) { - // Disable replacement feature for now - return state.Invalid(false, REJECT_CONFLICT, "txn-mempool-conflict"); + const CTransaction *ptxConflicting = pool.mapNextTx[txin.prevout].ptx; + if (!setConflicts.count(ptxConflicting->GetHash())) + { + // Allow opt-out of transaction replacement by setting + // nSequence >= maxint-1 on all inputs. + // + // maxint-1 is picked to still allow use of nLockTime by + // non-replacable transactions. All inputs rather than just one + // is for the sake of multi-party protocols, where we don't + // want a single party to be able to disable replacement. + // + // The opt-out ignores descendants as anyone relying on + // first-seen mempool behavior should be checking all + // unconfirmed ancestors anyway; doing otherwise is hopelessly + // insecure. + bool fReplacementOptOut = true; + BOOST_FOREACH(const CTxIn &txin, ptxConflicting->vin) + { + if (txin.nSequence < std::numeric_limits<unsigned int>::max()-1) + { + fReplacementOptOut = false; + break; + } + } + if (fReplacementOptOut) + return state.Invalid(false, REJECT_CONFLICT, "txn-mempool-conflict"); + + setConflicts.insert(ptxConflicting->GetHash()); + } } } } @@ -914,7 +942,7 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPool(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState &state, const CTransa CAmount mempoolRejectFee = pool.GetMinFee(GetArg("-maxmempool", DEFAULT_MAX_MEMPOOL_SIZE) * 1000000).GetFee(nSize); if (mempoolRejectFee > 0 && nFees < mempoolRejectFee) { return state.DoS(0, false, REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "mempool min fee not met", false, strprintf("%d < %d", nFees, mempoolRejectFee)); - } else if (GetBoolArg("-relaypriority", true) && nFees < ::minRelayTxFee.GetFee(nSize) && !AllowFree(view.GetPriority(tx, chainActive.Height() + 1))) { + } else if (GetBoolArg("-relaypriority", DEFAULT_RELAYPRIORITY) && nFees < ::minRelayTxFee.GetFee(nSize) && !AllowFree(view.GetPriority(tx, chainActive.Height() + 1))) { // Require that free transactions have sufficient priority to be mined in the next block. return state.DoS(0, false, REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient priority"); } @@ -936,7 +964,7 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPool(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState &state, const CTransa nLastTime = nNow; // -limitfreerelay unit is thousand-bytes-per-minute // At default rate it would take over a month to fill 1GB - if (dFreeCount >= GetArg("-limitfreerelay", 15)*10*1000) + if (dFreeCount >= GetArg("-limitfreerelay", DEFAULT_LIMITFREERELAY) * 10 * 1000) return state.DoS(0, false, REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "rate limited free transaction"); LogPrint("mempool", "Rate limit dFreeCount: %g => %g\n", dFreeCount, dFreeCount+nSize); dFreeCount += nSize; @@ -958,6 +986,160 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPool(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState &state, const CTransa return state.DoS(0, false, REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "too-long-mempool-chain", false, errString); } + // A transaction that spends outputs that would be replaced by it is invalid. Now + // that we have the set of all ancestors we can detect this + // pathological case by making sure setConflicts and setAncestors don't + // intersect. + BOOST_FOREACH(CTxMemPool::txiter ancestorIt, setAncestors) + { + const uint256 &hashAncestor = ancestorIt->GetTx().GetHash(); + if (setConflicts.count(hashAncestor)) + { + return state.DoS(10, error("AcceptToMemoryPool: %s spends conflicting transaction %s", + hash.ToString(), + hashAncestor.ToString()), + REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-spends-conflicting-tx"); + } + } + + // Check if it's economically rational to mine this transaction rather + // than the ones it replaces. + CAmount nConflictingFees = 0; + size_t nConflictingSize = 0; + uint64_t nConflictingCount = 0; + CTxMemPool::setEntries allConflicting; + + // If we don't hold the lock allConflicting might be incomplete; the + // subsequent RemoveStaged() and addUnchecked() calls don't guarantee + // mempool consistency for us. + LOCK(pool.cs); + if (setConflicts.size()) + { + CFeeRate newFeeRate(nFees, nSize); + set<uint256> setConflictsParents; + const int maxDescendantsToVisit = 100; + CTxMemPool::setEntries setIterConflicting; + BOOST_FOREACH(const uint256 &hashConflicting, setConflicts) + { + CTxMemPool::txiter mi = pool.mapTx.find(hashConflicting); + if (mi == pool.mapTx.end()) + continue; + + // Save these to avoid repeated lookups + setIterConflicting.insert(mi); + + // If this entry is "dirty", then we don't have descendant + // state for this transaction, which means we probably have + // lots of in-mempool descendants. + // Don't allow replacements of dirty transactions, to ensure + // that we don't spend too much time walking descendants. + // This should be rare. + if (mi->IsDirty()) { + return state.DoS(0, + error("AcceptToMemoryPool: rejecting replacement %s; cannot replace tx %s with untracked descendants", + hash.ToString(), + mi->GetTx().GetHash().ToString()), + REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "too many potential replacements"); + } + + // Don't allow the replacement to reduce the feerate of the + // mempool. + // + // We usually don't want to accept replacements with lower + // feerates than what they replaced as that would lower the + // feerate of the next block. Requiring that the feerate always + // be increased is also an easy-to-reason about way to prevent + // DoS attacks via replacements. + // + // The mining code doesn't (currently) take children into + // account (CPFP) so we only consider the feerates of + // transactions being directly replaced, not their indirect + // descendants. While that does mean high feerate children are + // ignored when deciding whether or not to replace, we do + // require the replacement to pay more overall fees too, + // mitigating most cases. + CFeeRate oldFeeRate(mi->GetFee(), mi->GetTxSize()); + if (newFeeRate <= oldFeeRate) + { + return state.DoS(0, + error("AcceptToMemoryPool: rejecting replacement %s; new feerate %s <= old feerate %s", + hash.ToString(), + newFeeRate.ToString(), + oldFeeRate.ToString()), + REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee"); + } + + BOOST_FOREACH(const CTxIn &txin, mi->GetTx().vin) + { + setConflictsParents.insert(txin.prevout.hash); + } + + nConflictingCount += mi->GetCountWithDescendants(); + } + // This potentially overestimates the number of actual descendants + // but we just want to be conservative to avoid doing too much + // work. + if (nConflictingCount <= maxDescendantsToVisit) { + // If not too many to replace, then calculate the set of + // transactions that would have to be evicted + BOOST_FOREACH(CTxMemPool::txiter it, setIterConflicting) { + pool.CalculateDescendants(it, allConflicting); + } + BOOST_FOREACH(CTxMemPool::txiter it, allConflicting) { + nConflictingFees += it->GetFee(); + nConflictingSize += it->GetTxSize(); + } + } else { + return state.DoS(0, + error("AcceptToMemoryPool: rejecting replacement %s; too many potential replacements (%d > %d)\n", + hash.ToString(), + nConflictingCount, + maxDescendantsToVisit), + REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "too many potential replacements"); + } + + for (unsigned int j = 0; j < tx.vin.size(); j++) + { + // We don't want to accept replacements that require low + // feerate junk to be mined first. Ideally we'd keep track of + // the ancestor feerates and make the decision based on that, + // but for now requiring all new inputs to be confirmed works. + if (!setConflictsParents.count(tx.vin[j].prevout.hash)) + { + // Rather than check the UTXO set - potentially expensive - + // it's cheaper to just check if the new input refers to a + // tx that's in the mempool. + if (pool.mapTx.find(tx.vin[j].prevout.hash) != pool.mapTx.end()) + return state.DoS(0, error("AcceptToMemoryPool: replacement %s adds unconfirmed input, idx %d", + hash.ToString(), j), + REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "replacement-adds-unconfirmed"); + } + } + + // The replacement must pay greater fees than the transactions it + // replaces - if we did the bandwidth used by those conflicting + // transactions would not be paid for. + if (nFees < nConflictingFees) + { + return state.DoS(0, error("AcceptToMemoryPool: rejecting replacement %s, less fees than conflicting txs; %s < %s", + hash.ToString(), FormatMoney(nFees), FormatMoney(nConflictingFees)), + REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee"); + } + + // Finally in addition to paying more fees than the conflicts the + // new transaction must pay for its own bandwidth. + CAmount nDeltaFees = nFees - nConflictingFees; + if (nDeltaFees < ::minRelayTxFee.GetFee(nSize)) + { + return state.DoS(0, + error("AcceptToMemoryPool: rejecting replacement %s, not enough additional fees to relay; %s < %s", + hash.ToString(), + FormatMoney(nDeltaFees), + FormatMoney(::minRelayTxFee.GetFee(nSize))), + REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee"); + } + } + // Check against previous transactions // This is done last to help prevent CPU exhaustion denial-of-service attacks. if (!CheckInputs(tx, state, view, true, STANDARD_SCRIPT_VERIFY_FLAGS, true)) @@ -978,6 +1160,17 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPool(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState &state, const CTransa __func__, hash.ToString(), FormatStateMessage(state)); } + // Remove conflicting transactions from the mempool + BOOST_FOREACH(const CTxMemPool::txiter it, allConflicting) + { + LogPrint("mempool", "replacing tx %s with %s for %s BTC additional fees, %d delta bytes\n", + it->GetTx().GetHash().ToString(), + hash.ToString(), + FormatMoney(nFees - nConflictingFees), + (int)nSize - (int)nConflictingSize); + } + pool.RemoveStaged(allConflicting); + // Store transaction in memory pool.addUnchecked(hash, entry, setAncestors, !IsInitialBlockDownload()); @@ -1244,7 +1437,7 @@ void Misbehaving(NodeId pnode, int howmuch) return; state->nMisbehavior += howmuch; - int banscore = GetArg("-banscore", 100); + int banscore = GetArg("-banscore", DEFAULT_BANSCORE_THRESHOLD); if (state->nMisbehavior >= banscore && state->nMisbehavior - howmuch < banscore) { LogPrintf("%s: %s (%d -> %d) BAN THRESHOLD EXCEEDED\n", __func__, state->name, state->nMisbehavior-howmuch, state->nMisbehavior); @@ -1947,6 +2140,7 @@ enum FlushStateMode { * or always and in all cases if we're in prune mode and are deleting files. */ bool static FlushStateToDisk(CValidationState &state, FlushStateMode mode) { + const CChainParams& chainparams = Params(); LOCK2(cs_main, cs_LastBlockFile); static int64_t nLastWrite = 0; static int64_t nLastFlush = 0; @@ -1955,7 +2149,7 @@ bool static FlushStateToDisk(CValidationState &state, FlushStateMode mode) { bool fFlushForPrune = false; try { if (fPruneMode && fCheckForPruning && !fReindex) { - FindFilesToPrune(setFilesToPrune); + FindFilesToPrune(setFilesToPrune, chainparams.PruneAfterHeight()); fCheckForPruning = false; if (!setFilesToPrune.empty()) { fFlushForPrune = true; @@ -2155,8 +2349,8 @@ static int64_t nTimePostConnect = 0; * Connect a new block to chainActive. pblock is either NULL or a pointer to a CBlock * corresponding to pindexNew, to bypass loading it again from disk. */ -bool static ConnectTip(CValidationState &state, CBlockIndex *pindexNew, const CBlock *pblock) { - const CChainParams& chainparams = Params(); +bool static ConnectTip(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, CBlockIndex* pindexNew, const CBlock* pblock) +{ assert(pindexNew->pprev == chainActive.Tip()); mempool.check(pcoinsTip); // Read block from disk. @@ -2288,8 +2482,8 @@ static void PruneBlockIndexCandidates() { * Try to make some progress towards making pindexMostWork the active block. * pblock is either NULL or a pointer to a CBlock corresponding to pindexMostWork. */ -static bool ActivateBestChainStep(CValidationState &state, CBlockIndex *pindexMostWork, const CBlock *pblock) { - const CChainParams& chainparams = Params(); +static bool ActivateBestChainStep(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, CBlockIndex* pindexMostWork, const CBlock* pblock) +{ AssertLockHeld(cs_main); bool fInvalidFound = false; const CBlockIndex *pindexOldTip = chainActive.Tip(); @@ -2322,7 +2516,7 @@ static bool ActivateBestChainStep(CValidationState &state, CBlockIndex *pindexMo // Connect new blocks. BOOST_REVERSE_FOREACH(CBlockIndex *pindexConnect, vpindexToConnect) { - if (!ConnectTip(state, pindexConnect, pindexConnect == pindexMostWork ? pblock : NULL)) { + if (!ConnectTip(state, chainparams, pindexConnect, pindexConnect == pindexMostWork ? pblock : NULL)) { if (state.IsInvalid()) { // The block violates a consensus rule. if (!state.CorruptionPossible()) @@ -2363,10 +2557,10 @@ static bool ActivateBestChainStep(CValidationState &state, CBlockIndex *pindexMo * or an activated best chain. pblock is either NULL or a pointer to a block * that is already loaded (to avoid loading it again from disk). */ -bool ActivateBestChain(CValidationState &state, const CBlock *pblock) { +bool ActivateBestChain(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, const CBlock* pblock) +{ CBlockIndex *pindexNewTip = NULL; CBlockIndex *pindexMostWork = NULL; - const CChainParams& chainparams = Params(); do { boost::this_thread::interruption_point(); @@ -2379,7 +2573,7 @@ bool ActivateBestChain(CValidationState &state, const CBlock *pblock) { if (pindexMostWork == NULL || pindexMostWork == chainActive.Tip()) return true; - if (!ActivateBestChainStep(state, pindexMostWork, pblock && pblock->GetHash() == pindexMostWork->GetBlockHash() ? pblock : NULL)) + if (!ActivateBestChainStep(state, chainparams, pindexMostWork, pblock && pblock->GetHash() == pindexMostWork->GetBlockHash() ? pblock : NULL)) return false; pindexNewTip = chainActive.Tip(); @@ -2683,7 +2877,7 @@ bool CheckBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, bool fCheckPOW, bo // Check the merkle root. if (fCheckMerkleRoot) { bool mutated; - uint256 hashMerkleRoot2 = block.ComputeMerkleRoot(&mutated); + uint256 hashMerkleRoot2 = BlockMerkleRoot(block, &mutated); if (block.hashMerkleRoot != hashMerkleRoot2) return state.DoS(100, error("CheckBlock(): hashMerkleRoot mismatch"), REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txnmrklroot", true); @@ -2858,9 +3052,9 @@ static bool AcceptBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, CValidationState& state return true; } -bool AcceptBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, CBlockIndex** ppindex, bool fRequested, CDiskBlockPos* dbp) +/** Store block on disk. If dbp is non-NULL, the file is known to already reside on disk */ +static bool AcceptBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, CBlockIndex** ppindex, bool fRequested, CDiskBlockPos* dbp) { - const CChainParams& chainparams = Params(); AssertLockHeld(cs_main); CBlockIndex *&pindex = *ppindex; @@ -2950,7 +3144,7 @@ bool ProcessNewBlock(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, c // Store to disk CBlockIndex *pindex = NULL; - bool ret = AcceptBlock(*pblock, state, &pindex, fRequested, dbp); + bool ret = AcceptBlock(*pblock, state, chainparams, &pindex, fRequested, dbp); if (pindex && pfrom) { mapBlockSource[pindex->GetBlockHash()] = pfrom->GetId(); } @@ -2959,7 +3153,7 @@ bool ProcessNewBlock(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, c return error("%s: AcceptBlock FAILED", __func__); } - if (!ActivateBestChain(state, pblock)) + if (!ActivateBestChain(state, chainparams, pblock)) return error("%s: ActivateBestChain failed", __func__); return true; @@ -3049,13 +3243,13 @@ void UnlinkPrunedFiles(std::set<int>& setFilesToPrune) } /* Calculate the block/rev files that should be deleted to remain under target*/ -void FindFilesToPrune(std::set<int>& setFilesToPrune) +void FindFilesToPrune(std::set<int>& setFilesToPrune, uint64_t nPruneAfterHeight) { LOCK2(cs_main, cs_LastBlockFile); if (chainActive.Tip() == NULL || nPruneTarget == 0) { return; } - if (chainActive.Tip()->nHeight <= Params().PruneAfterHeight()) { + if (chainActive.Tip()->nHeight <= nPruneAfterHeight) { return; } @@ -3283,9 +3477,8 @@ CVerifyDB::~CVerifyDB() uiInterface.ShowProgress("", 100); } -bool CVerifyDB::VerifyDB(CCoinsView *coinsview, int nCheckLevel, int nCheckDepth) +bool CVerifyDB::VerifyDB(const CChainParams& chainparams, CCoinsView *coinsview, int nCheckLevel, int nCheckDepth) { - const CChainParams& chainparams = Params(); LOCK(cs_main); if (chainActive.Tip() == NULL || chainActive.Tip()->pprev == NULL) return true; @@ -3401,9 +3594,8 @@ bool LoadBlockIndex() return true; } - -bool InitBlockIndex() { - const CChainParams& chainparams = Params(); +bool InitBlockIndex(const CChainParams& chainparams) +{ LOCK(cs_main); // Initialize global variables that cannot be constructed at startup. @@ -3414,14 +3606,14 @@ bool InitBlockIndex() { return true; // Use the provided setting for -txindex in the new database - fTxIndex = GetBoolArg("-txindex", false); + fTxIndex = GetBoolArg("-txindex", DEFAULT_TXINDEX); pblocktree->WriteFlag("txindex", fTxIndex); LogPrintf("Initializing databases...\n"); // Only add the genesis block if not reindexing (in which case we reuse the one already on disk) if (!fReindex) { try { - CBlock &block = const_cast<CBlock&>(Params().GenesisBlock()); + CBlock &block = const_cast<CBlock&>(chainparams.GenesisBlock()); // Start new block file unsigned int nBlockSize = ::GetSerializeSize(block, SER_DISK, CLIENT_VERSION); CDiskBlockPos blockPos; @@ -3433,7 +3625,7 @@ bool InitBlockIndex() { CBlockIndex *pindex = AddToBlockIndex(block); if (!ReceivedBlockTransactions(block, state, pindex, blockPos)) return error("LoadBlockIndex(): genesis block not accepted"); - if (!ActivateBestChain(state, &block)) + if (!ActivateBestChain(state, chainparams, &block)) return error("LoadBlockIndex(): genesis block cannot be activated"); // Force a chainstate write so that when we VerifyDB in a moment, it doesn't check stale data return FlushStateToDisk(state, FLUSH_STATE_ALWAYS); @@ -3445,11 +3637,8 @@ bool InitBlockIndex() { return true; } - - -bool LoadExternalBlockFile(FILE* fileIn, CDiskBlockPos *dbp) +bool LoadExternalBlockFile(const CChainParams& chainparams, FILE* fileIn, CDiskBlockPos *dbp) { - const CChainParams& chainparams = Params(); // Map of disk positions for blocks with unknown parent (only used for reindex) static std::multimap<uint256, CDiskBlockPos> mapBlocksUnknownParent; int64_t nStart = GetTimeMillis(); @@ -3469,10 +3658,10 @@ bool LoadExternalBlockFile(FILE* fileIn, CDiskBlockPos *dbp) try { // locate a header unsigned char buf[MESSAGE_START_SIZE]; - blkdat.FindByte(Params().MessageStart()[0]); + blkdat.FindByte(chainparams.MessageStart()[0]); nRewind = blkdat.GetPos()+1; blkdat >> FLATDATA(buf); - if (memcmp(buf, Params().MessageStart(), MESSAGE_START_SIZE)) + if (memcmp(buf, chainparams.MessageStart(), MESSAGE_START_SIZE)) continue; // read size blkdat >> nSize; @@ -3748,7 +3937,7 @@ std::string GetWarnings(const std::string& strFor) if (!CLIENT_VERSION_IS_RELEASE) strStatusBar = _("This is a pre-release test build - use at your own risk - do not use for mining or merchant applications"); - if (GetBoolArg("-testsafemode", false)) + if (GetBoolArg("-testsafemode", DEFAULT_TESTSAFEMODE)) strStatusBar = strRPC = "testsafemode enabled"; // Misc warnings like out of disk space and clock is wrong @@ -3866,7 +4055,7 @@ void static ProcessGetData(CNode* pfrom, const Consensus::Params& consensusParam // best equivalent proof of work) than the best header chain we know about. send = mi->second->IsValid(BLOCK_VALID_SCRIPTS) && (pindexBestHeader != NULL) && (pindexBestHeader->GetBlockTime() - mi->second->GetBlockTime() < nOneMonth) && - (GetBlockProofEquivalentTime(*pindexBestHeader, *mi->second, *pindexBestHeader, Params().GetConsensus()) < nOneMonth); + (GetBlockProofEquivalentTime(*pindexBestHeader, *mi->second, *pindexBestHeader, consensusParams) < nOneMonth); if (!send) { LogPrintf("%s: ignoring request from peer=%i for old block that isn't in the main chain\n", __func__, pfrom->GetId()); } @@ -4743,7 +4932,7 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, string strCommand, CDataStream& vRecv, uint256 alertHash = alert.GetHash(); if (pfrom->setKnown.count(alertHash) == 0) { - if (alert.ProcessAlert(Params().AlertKey())) + if (alert.ProcessAlert(chainparams.AlertKey())) { // Relay pfrom->setKnown.insert(alertHash); |