diff options
| author | MarcoFalke <[email protected]> | 2018-08-25 18:31:21 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | MarcoFalke <[email protected]> | 2018-08-25 18:31:29 -0400 |
| commit | 91186e59844d6028d689f146d5d58c5e7fc95d58 (patch) | |
| tree | 5ccfc590275b2c24df7859b19afc021e65283272 /src/httpserver.cpp | |
| parent | Merge #12676: Show "bip125-replaceable" flag, when retrieving mempool entries (diff) | |
| parent | Add compile time checking for all cs_main runtime locking assertions (diff) | |
| download | discoin-91186e59844d6028d689f146d5d58c5e7fc95d58.tar.xz discoin-91186e59844d6028d689f146d5d58c5e7fc95d58.zip | |
Merge #13083: Add compile time checking for cs_main runtime locking assertions
9e0a514112 Add compile time checking for all cs_main runtime locking assertions (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add compile time checking for `cs_main` runtime locking assertions.
This PR is a subset of #12665. The PR was broken up to make reviewing easier.
The intention is that literally all `EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED`/`LOCKS_EXCLUDED`:s added in this PR should follow either directly or indirectly from `AssertLockHeld(…)`/`AssertLockNotHeld(…)`:s already existing in the repo.
Consider the case where function `A(…)` contains `AssertLockHeld(cs_foo)` (without
first locking `cs_foo` in `A`), and that `B(…)` calls `A(…)` (without first locking `cs_main`):
* It _directly_ follows that: `A(…)` should have an `EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_foo)` annotation.
* It _indirectly_ follows that: `B(…)` should have an `EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_foo)` annotation.
Tree-SHA512: 120e7410c4c223dbc7d42030b1a19e328d01a55f041bb6fb5eaac10ac35cb0c5d469b9b3bda6444731164c73b88ac6495a00890672b107d9305e891571f64dd6
Diffstat (limited to 'src/httpserver.cpp')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions